PREFERENSI SISWA SMA KELAS 11 TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN PAPAN TULIS DI ERA DIGITAL DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KETERLIBATAN BELAJAR
Kata Kunci:
papan tulis, Generasi Z, keterlibatan belajar, alat bantu mengajar, metode campuranAbstrak
Di tengah arus digitalisasi pendidikan, terdapat kecenderungan menarik di kalangan siswa Generasi Z yang justru menunjukkan preferensi terhadap media pembelajaran tradisional seperti papan tulis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengidentifikasi dan mengukur preferensi siswa kelas XI terhadap penggunaan papan tulis fisik dibandingkan media digital; (2) mengeksplorasi faktor-faktor yang melatarbelakangi preferensi tersebut; dan (3) menganalisis implikasinya terhadap keterlibatan belajar siswa. Pendekatan metode campuran digunakan dengan melibatkan angket skala Likert dan wawancara semi-terstruktur terhadap siswa dan seorang dosen pendidikan. Hasil uji Wilcoxon Signed Ranks menunjukkan preferensi signifikan terhadap penggunaan papan tulis (p = 0,002), di mana sebagian besar siswa melaporkan peningkatan fokus, pemahaman, dan keterlibatan saat guru menggunakan papan tulis secara bertahap. Temuan kualitatif mendukung hasil ini, menunjukkan bahwa papan tulis memfasilitasi ritme belajar yang lebih sinkron, interaksi yang lebih alami, dan memperkuat proses kognitif bersama antara guru dan siswa. Meskipun tergolong digital natives, siswa tetap mengapresiasi nilai pedagogis dari media konvensional. Studi ini merekomendasikan pendekatan blended learning yang mengintegrasikan keunggulan papan tulis dan media digital secara proporsional untuk meningkatkan keterlibatan belajar di era modern.
Referensi
P. Ainun Fadia, H. S. Mawarni, L. Sakinah, N. A. Lestari, and T. H. Purna, “IDENTIFIKASI TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL DALAM DUNIA PENDIDIKAN MENGENAI PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN DI ERA DISRUPSI,” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, vol. 6, pp. 1570–1580, Jun. 2022.
H. S. Hammad, “Teaching the Digital Natives: Examining the Learning Needs and Preferences of Gen Z Learners in Higher Education,” Transcultural Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences (TJHSS), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 214–242, Jan. 2025.
K. Fuchs, “Preparing Students for Success in a Changing World: The Role of Virtual Whiteboards in the Modern Classroom,” The Asian Institute of Research: Education Quarterly Reviews, vol. 4, pp. 151–158, 2021, doi: 10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.182.
J. Muttappallymyalil, S. Mendis, L. J. John, N. Shanthakumari, J. Sreedharan, and R. B. Shaikh, “Evolution of technology in teaching: Blackboard and beyond in Medical Education,” Nepal J Epidemiol, pp. 589–594, Sep. 2016.
M. Haldane, “Interactivity and the digital whiteboard: weaving the fabric of learning,” Learn Media Technol, vol. 32, pp. 257–270, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1080/17439880701511107.
O. Vitvitskaya, J. A. Suyo-Vega, M. E. Meneses-La-Riva, and V. H. Fernández-Bedoya, “Behaviours and Characteristics of Digital Natives Throughout the Teaching-Learning Process: A Systematic Review of Scientific Literature from 2016 to 2021,” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 38–49, May 2022, doi: 10.36941/ajis-2022-0066.
B. R. Mccoy, “Gen Z and Digital Distractions in the Classroom: Student Gen Z and Digital Distractions in the Classroom: Student Classroom Use of Digital Devices for Non-Class Related Purposes Classroom Use of Digital Devices for Non-Class Related Purposes Gen Z and Digital Distractions in the Classroom: Student Classroom Use of Digital Devices for Non-Class Related Purposes.” [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub
R. R. A. Shaleha and N. Roque, “Cognitive Performance in the Digital Era: Generational Differences, Stress, and Distraction’s Impact on Cognitive Performance,” International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.4018/IJCBPL.341788.
S. J. Schmidt, “Distracted learning: Big problem and golden opportunity,” J Food Sci Educ, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 278–291, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1111/1541-4329.12206.
P. A. Mueller and D. M. Oppenheimer, “The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking,” Psychol Sci, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1159–1168, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0956797614524581.
J. Sweller, “Cognitive load theory and educational technology,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3.
J. Kwai and F. Yap, “Using white boards to engage students with employability skills”, doi: 10.71957/2nak5788.
M. Hernandez-de-Menendez, C. A. Escobar Díaz, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Educational experiences with Generation Z,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 847–859, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9.
L. Reid, D. Button, and M. Brommeyer, “Challenging the Myth of the Digital Native: A Narrative Review,” Jun. 01, 2023, MDPI. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13020052.
E. J. Cilliers, “Reflecting on Social Learning Tools to Enhance the Teaching-Learning Experience of Generation Z Learners,” Front Educ (Lausanne), vol. 5, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.606533.
M. Bourbour, “Using digital technology in early education teaching: learning from teachers’ teaching practice with interactive whiteboard,” 2023, Routledge. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2020.1848523.
