Analisis Peluang Pengembangan Connecting Tourism di Goa Selarong dan Kasongan Kabupaten Bantul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64730/jrdbantul.v26i3.168Kata Kunci:
connecting tourism, gravitasi spasial, location quotient, tata kelola kolaboratif, pembangunan wilayahAbstrak
Ketimpangan perkembangan antarwilayah destinasi wisata menjadi tantangan utama pembangunan ekonomi berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Bantul. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peluang pengembangan dan merumuskan strategi connecting tourism antara Desa Wisata Kasongan dan Goa Selarong. Pendekatan deskriptif-kualitatif dengan analisis data sekunder periode 2021–2025 diterapkan pada Kapanewon Kasihan dan Pajangan. Metode analisis memadukan Spatial Gravity Model, Location Quotient (LQ), dan matriks SWOT. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan potensi interaksi spasial yang tinggi sebesar 187 juta satuan interaksi akibat kedekatan geografis (5–7 km), tetapi keterhubungan fungsional antardestinasi belum terbentuk. Analisis LQ menegaskan polarisasi ekonomi, di mana Kasihan berperan sebagai sektor basis (core) dengan LQ 1,30 dan 88 unit akomodasi, sedangkan Pajangan tergolong nonbasis (periphery) dengan LQ 0,09 dan 3 unit akomodasi. Disparitas daya dukung tersebut memicu kebocoran ekonomi serta penurunan kunjungan Goa Selarong sebesar 27,7%. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa pengembangan connecting tourism melalui paket wisata tematik, penguatan tata kelola kolaboratif, dan integrasi digital efektif mendorong pemerataan ekonomi wilayah.
Referensi
B. Bramwell, J. Higham, B. Lane, and G. Miller, “Twenty-five years of sustainable tourism and the Journal of Sustainable Tourism: looking back and moving forward,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2017, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1251689.
R. Nunkoo, A. Sharma, N. P. Rana, Y. K. Dwivedi, and V. A. Sunnassee, “Advancing sustainable development goals through interdisciplinarity in sustainable tourism research,” J. Sustain. Tour., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 735–759, 2023, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2021.2004416.
J. Xu, T. Su, X. Cheng, and H. Chen, “Exploring the destination network in the context of tourism mobility: a multi-scale analytical framework,” Curr. Issues Tour., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1197–1219, 2025, doi: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2334830.
V. Herasimovich, A. Alzua-Sorzabal, and B. Guereño-Omil, “Online networking behaviour of tourism stakeholders in a multi-destination region: A hyperlink network analysis,” J. Destin. Mark. Manag., vol. 31, no. November 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100844.
Y. Ieiri, S. Tengfei, and R. Hishiyama, “Value creation framework for tourist destinations based on designable evaluation network,” Soc. Networks, vol. 71, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.05.003.
M. Novelli, B. Schmitz, and T. Spencer, “Networks, clusters and innovation in tourism: A UK experience,” Tour. Manag., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1141–1152, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.11.011.
R. Baggio, “Network science and tourism – the state of the art,” Tour. Rev., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-01-2017-0008.
B. Kádár and M. Gede, “Tourism flows in large-scale destination systems,” Ann. Tour. Res., vol. 87, p. 103113, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.103113.
BPS Kabupaten Bantul, “Kabupaten Bantul Dalam Angka 2025,” Bantul, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://bantulkab.bps.go.id
Dinas Pariwisata Kabupaten Bantul, “Laporan Kinerja Dinas Pariwisata Tahun 2025,” Bantul, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://pariwisata.bantulkab.go.id/hal/informasi-unduhan
R. W. Butler, “The concept of a tourist area cycle of evolution: Implications for management of resources,” Can. Geogr., vol. 24, pp. 5–12, 1980, doi: https://doi-org.ezproxy.ugm.ac.id/10.1111/j.1541-0064.1980.tb00970.x.
R. Butler, “Tourism destination development: the tourism area life cycle model,” Tour. Geogr., vol. 27, no. 3–4, pp. 599–607, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14616688.2024.2325932.
A. Sen and T. E. Smith, Gravity Models of Spatial Interaction Behavior, 1st ed. Berlin: Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79880-1.
J. R. Roy and J. C. Thill, “Spatial interaction modelling,” Pap. Reg. Sci., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 339–361, 2004, doi: 10.1007/s10110-003-0189-4.
C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.
J. Almeida, C. Costa, and F. N. da Silva, “Collaborative approach for tourism conflict management: A Portuguese case study,” Land use policy, vol. 75, pp. 166–179, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.034.
J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009. [Online]. Available: https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd6e
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Sage US, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.sagepub.com/shop/buy-a-book/case-study-research-and-applications-6-250150
C. Jin, J. Xu, and Z. Huang, “Spatiotemporal analysis of regional tourism development: A semiparametric Geographically Weighted Regression model approach,” Habitat Int., vol. 87, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.03.011.
A. M. Isserman, “The Location Quotient Approach to Estimating Regional Economic Impacts,” J. Am. Plan. Assoc., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 1977, doi: 10.1080/01944367708977758.
M. M. Miller, L. J. Gibson, and N. G. Wright, “Location Quotient: A Basic Tool for Economic Development Analysis,” Con. Dev. Rev., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 65, 1991, [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/location-quotient-basic-tool-economic-development/docview/230124740/se-2?accountid=13771
H. Weihrich, “The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis,” Long Range Plann., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 1982, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0.
R. W. Puyt, F. B. Lie, and C. P. M. Wilderom, “The origins of SWOT analysis,” Long Range Plann., vol. 56, no. 3, p. 102304, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2023.102304.
